By: Michael

Michael — Sun, 18 Mar 2012 08:16:19 +0000

I wondered the same thing. The other thing I’m wendoring about concerns who in Ann Arbor actually IS getting news strictly from the web or another source. Sure, the campus kids are surfing and getting news from all over the place, but what about older boomers and seniors? Many are on line, using email, etc., but how many are actually visiting newspaper sites and reading AnnArbor.com? How many are actually reading lenconnect.com? I still think the Ann Arbor market could support a daily; the newspaper companies need to change the business model and maybe they will need to suffer through less profits until they get it to work, like Ford, for example. Not great profits but changing its business model and responding to customers WITHOUT taking government bailout money. I think there still is a big demand for hard copy and I do not think a skeletal staff at the AAN is going to be able to keep up with all of the city business, local news, etc. that is out there. Many of the posts I read talked about the paper taking a liberal slant and cited that as a reason for reduced readership, but I think it’s much more than a perception of news being slanted left or right. I think it’s more about not responding to customer needs and demands. Maybe people in Ann Arbor would have liked to see more local coverage and it didn’t happen due to reductions in staffing that affects coverage. It is happening everywhere so perhaps there IS a lesson to be learned in making changes. Could the problem be businessmen running newspapers instead of journalists? I don’t know but I don’t think shuttering a 174-year-old business and going to the web is going to be a fix.

Comments on: Lazy Journalism

By: Michael